Body
Building a Useful Goal Statement
- Raphael L. Vitalo, Ph.D.
Introduction
Whether a task is self-assigned or assigned by another, there
is a minimal set of facts one needs to perform the task successfully. These
are:
- the goal of the task,
- the resources to be provided prior to starting it (inputs),
- the outputs the task must produce,
- the method that will be used to transform inputs into outputs (process),
- the test one completes to verify that the task was executed correctly (feedback),
and
- a list of the individuals or groups with whom to communicate while performing
the task (coordination), the information to be exchanged, and the protocols
to follow with each.
This article provides you with guidance for representing the
first component of this set of knowledge, the task's goal. Use it to define
a goal you seek to realize or as a guide for documenting the goal someone else
seeks to realize.
Goal
A goal describes the result your efforts seek to produce. It is the reference
point you use to plan your work and evaluate whether you succeeded. A goal statement also enables
you to orient others to what you are attempting to realize and therefore is
the basis for eliciting their cooperative efforts in pursuing it. All of these
benefits, however, depend on the goal being sound. If the goal is not sound,
it will point you in the wrong direction, lack information you need to ensure
your success, or provide erroneous criteria for your use in deciding whether
you succeeded. A badly formed goal is just as potent as a well-formed goal—except
that the former ensures failure while the later enables success. The process
documented below and outlined in Exhibit 1 guides you in ensuring that the goal
you form will enable your success, not ensure your failure.
Getting Ready Tasks
1. Document the “Why”
Behind a Goal
Every goal has a reason that prompted its creation. The “why”
is either to solve a problem or to advance the realization of some opportunity
or larger purpose. You will use this information to define the result the goal
must produce and to build and check its correctness. To document the “Why”
behind the goal you are about to write, you need to answer the following questions.
- What is the problem this goal is suppose to resolve or the
opportunity it is to advance or realize?
- How, when, and where was the problem or opportunity detected?
- Who does this problem or opportunity involve or affect?
- How is the problem hurting whomever it involves or affects or how can the
opportunity enhance these people or groups when it is realized?
- Why does the problem exist? In other words, what are its root causes? Which
root cause is the goal eliminating? What needed elements must be put in place
to advance or realize the opportunity the goal was established to advance?
Which needed element is the goal putting in place?
- What previous efforts have been tried to remove this root cause or to put
in place the needed element?
- Why did these efforts fail?
Record this information. Keep what you record as you will use
it as you proceed through this process.
2. Understand the Structural
Foundation of Every Goal
Every human goal involves transforming an object from a “given”
state to a “desired” state. In the case of a problem, you are eliminating
something that is unwanted. In the case of an opportunity, you are putting in
place something that is needed. This act of transformation defines the result
your goal must realize. To build a well-formed goal statement, you first need
to know what is to be transformed (the Object) and both its initial
and desired final state. These elements—as well as who will do the transforming
(the Actor)—constitute the structural foundation of every goal.
They are: the object to be acted on, the initial state of the object and its
intended final state, and the actor responsible for producing the final state
(Exhibit 2). Before writing your goal statement, you must identify the beginning
structural foundation of your goal. Here, learn the meaning of each of the structural
foundation elements.
|
Exhibit
2. The Elements That Constitute the Beginning Structural Foundation of
Any Goal |
|
|
Object
|
Any logical or
physical thinge.g., a car, a software design, an audience of people
attending a seminar |
|
|
Initial State
|
The current or found state
of the object before the actor begins performance. This state will
be either that the object does not yet exist or it exists in a way different
from what is desirede.g., we have no car or our car does not start |
|
|
Final State
|
The end or transformed state
of the object after the actor completes his or her performancee.g.,
we have a car or our car starts |
|
|
Actor
|
The identity of the performer
that must produce the final state (may be a person or machine; must be
either a class of performerse.g., Software Engineers or a member
of that classe.g., Miguel Valenza, Software Engineer) |
|
|
|
|
3. Extract the Goal’s
Structural Foundation from the “Why” Information
The beginning structural elements of your goal are derived from
an analysis of the reason why the goal is being pursued. In the top section
of Exhibit 3 is an example of the “Why” behind the goal for someone
who is assigned to produce the software specifications for a computer application.
It is an abridged statement for reasons of space. In the bottom section of Exhibit
3 is the beginning structural foundation elements of a goal extracted from the
“Why.”
|
Exhibit
3. An Example of Extracting the Beginning Structural Foundation of a Goal
From the Reason Why It Is Being Pursued |
|
|
Example
of the "Why" Behind a Goal |
|
|
Software Engineers at the XYZ Software
Solutions Company build tailored computer solutions for businesses experiencing
computing-based problems. Their work takes a problem a customer is experiencing
due to the absence of an adequate software solution to their computing needs
and uses that information to design and build a computer application that
accomplishes the task the customer needs done thereby eliminating the barrier
to success that the customer is experiencing. One link in this process is
the production of software specifications. This document translates the
customer's needs as described in a software requirements document into guidance
that programmers use to build the software solution that will meet the customer's
needs. A software engineer must create this software specifications document.
Without such specifications, the development of a software application of
any significance is almost certain to fail and with that failure the XYZ's
software business itself will fail. |
|
|
Beginning
Structural Foundation Extracted From the "Why" |
|
|
Object |
The software
specifications for a proposed computer application |
|
|
Initial State |
Does not exist |
|
|
Final State |
Exists |
|
|
Actor |
Software engineer |
|
|
|
|
4. Define the Result the Goal Must Accomplish
To define the result that the goal must accomplish, express the goal's foundation
structural elements as an infinitive phrase. An infinitive phrase has the basic
form: "To [verb] + [object]." When used as a format for restating the structural
foundation of a goal, it literally reads: "To transform [object] from [initial
state] to [final state]." For example, here is how the structural elements recorded
in Exhibit 3 would read, if written literally: "To transform the software specifications
for a computer application from not existing to existing." You should adjust
this literal translation for readability. Thus, the previous statement might
be rendered as: "To produce software specifications for a proposed computer
application." This infinitive phrase describes the result the goal must produce.
5. Understand the Components of a Complete Goal Statement
Each useful goal statement includes six components: a "to" statement that tells
the result to be produced, a "for" statement that tells who is to benefit from
accomplishing the goal, a "by" statement that names the task or process to be
implemented to produce the result, a "so that" statement that lists the benefits
to be produced for each benefiting party, a "conditions" statement that lists
the constraints that one must abide while achieving the goal, and a "success
criteria" statement that lists the benchmarks that define success (Exhibit 4).
|
Exhibit
4. The Components of a Complete Goal Statement |
|
|
Component |
Contents |
|
|
To |
States the result the goal
must produce. Always begins with "To," identifies the object to be
created or transformed and the final state it should be in when the
goal is realized. Example: “To produce Widget A” or “To
make Product X more customer satisfying.” |
|
|
For |
States for whom the result
is being producedthe beneficiaries of the goal’s achievement.
Example: ”For customers, the business, and all its stakeholders.” |
|
|
By |
Names the method that will
be used to accomplish the “To.” An example is: “By eliminating
unwanted features and adding wanted features.” To be correct, the “By” activity
must be capable of accomplishing the result specified in the “To” while
satisfying the “Conditions” listed below. |
|
|
So That |
Lists the immediate benefits
the result should produce for each beneficiary of the goal. Each benefit
identifies how a beneficiary of the goal will be better off once the "To"
is achieved. |
|
|
Conditions |
States other requirements
that the pursuit of the goal must satisfy. These may:
- limit resources used (e.g., time, money, people),
- state requirements specific to taking a certain action—e.g.,
use a specific tool or involve specified people or abide by a certain
protocol
in pursuing the goal (‘must do’ contstraints), or
- set as "off-limits" certain decisions or actions (‘must
not do’ constraints).
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
The benchmarks that must be
met for the goal to be judged as achieved. Always includes criteria that
test whether the efforts expended:
- produced the result specified in the "To,"
- delivered the benefits specified in the "So That," and
- satisfied the constraints recorded in the "Conditions."
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit 5 presents an example of a complete goal statement defined by management
of the XYZ Software Solutions Company. This company builds computing solutions
that enable the secure and reliable archiving, transfer, and retrieval of business-critical
data for its customers. A number of these solutions incorporate Netlink API
calls. The company has noted that these applications have experienced many bugs
that can be traced to how their kernel software developers implement code accessing
the Linux Generic Netlink API. These bugs either are caught in testing and require
fixes that add cost and delay the release of a customer required application
or slip through testing and reach customers causing our customers unreasonable
difficulties that compromise their performance and our standing as their software
solutions vendor. To reduce development cost; speed release of stable, well
performing solutions; and eliminate customer-experienced breakdowns in our products,
the company's kernel programmers need to greatly reduce the number of accidental
programming mistakes in their code that are due to incorrect practices in using
the Linux Generic Netlink API. It appears that while programmers are schooled
in how to implement this API, they do not apply the correct rules for using
the API at the point of their programming.
|
Exhibit
5. An Example of a Complete Goal Statement |
|
|
Component |
Example |
|
|
To |
"To reduce the accidental
programming mistakes contained in software applications using the Linux
Generic Netlink API" |
|
|
For |
Kernel programmers, our
customers, our company and its owners |
|
|
By |
Equipping programmers
with point-of-use guidance that eliminates their errors in using the
Linux Generic Netlink API |
|
|
So That |
- Programmers focus more on advancing product development and less
on correcting problems caused by their errors in using the Netlink
API such as Namespace collision of protocol families and Demultiplexing
messages.
- Customers get a better product, faster.
- The company's reputation as a quality software solutions vendor
is preserved
- Owners have lower development costs and shorter development cycle
times
|
|
|
Conditions |
- Must use the 2.6 series kernel.
- Must register with the kernel component every use process to be
sent unrequested messages or data
- Must recognize that, in user space, the API is socket based and
program accordingly
|
|
|
Success Criteria1 |
- Programming mistakes related to using the Netlink API are reduced
- Programmers' time spent focusing on the problem to be solved relative
to fixing Netlink API coding errors increases
- Quality of code produced using Netlink API is elevated
- Development time for code using Netlink API is produced faster
- Development costs for components using Netlink API are reduced
- Programmers apply the guidance only with code using the 2.6 series
kernel
- Code registers with the kernel component every user process that
must be sent unrequested messages or data
- Coding is consistent with the understanding that the API is socket
based
|
|
|
- The statements recorded here are abridged versions
of the success criteria. Each has the anchor of a success criterion
and the final state is should possess. They are used to accommodate
the space available in a goal statement. See Exhibit 11,below, for the
complete statement of each success criterion identified above. Every
goal statement should have such a table attached to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Doing Tasks
1. Draft Your Goal Statement
Follow the steps defined below to represent your goal. Use the clarifying questions
presented in Exhibit 6 to assist you in defining each component of the goal
statement. Obtain the answers to these questions by analyzing the documented
"Why" behind your goal. Use the tips provided in Exhibit 7 to locate what information
in the reason why the goal is being pursued relates to each component of the
goal statement.
- Use the result you define in Getting Ready Step 4 to document the “To”
component.
- Record for whom the result is being producedthe beneficiaries of the
goalin the “For” component. Search the reason for pursuing
the goal for all acknowledged parties connected to the problem being solved
or the opportunity being realized. Each such party is a potential beneficiary
from achieving the goal.
- Name in the “By” component the process or task that will accomplish
the “To.” The task must be able to eliminate the root cause of
the problem or put in place the element needed to realize the opportunity
the goal is to advance.
- List the benefits in the “So That” component that the result
should produce for each person or group identified in the “For”
component of the goal. Flip each negative affect experienced from the current
state into a positive benefit realized once the final state is produced.
- List other requirements the pursuit of the goal must satisfy in the “Conditions”
component. See Exhibit 6 for added guidance in identifying conditions.
- List the benchmarks that must be met for the goal to be judged ‘achieved’
in the “Success Criteria” component. For now, state what should
be checked and what state it should be in. Detailed guidance for building
success criteria is provided in Doing Step 2.
As should be clear to you from this exercise, the better developed your
description of the reason why the goal is being pursued is, the better the quality
of the goal you can build.
|
Exhibit
6. Suggested Clarifying Questions for Drafting a Goal Statement |
|
|
Component |
Clarifying
Question |
|
|
To |
When this goal is accomplished, what should
be changed? How should it be changed? |
|
|
For |
Who is affected by this goal? Who should benefit
from the result it will produce? |
|
|
By |
How shall I name the task that accomplishes
this goal? |
|
|
So That |
What benefits should this task produce for each
benefiting party? |
|
|
Conditions |
- Is there a time period within which this task must be completed?
- Where or when may this task be done (settings, contexts)?
- Where or when may this task not be done (settings, contexts)?
- With whom or what should the task performer coordinate during task
implementation? What information should be exchanged? What communication
protocol should be followed?
- What access to information is permitted during task performance?
- What access to information is denied during task performance?
- What resources will the performer have to work with in getting the
task done? Consider people, training, tools, equipment, facilities,
budget, etc.1
- What resources are off-limits to the performer?
- What authority will the performer have for making decisions about
direction, approach, resourcing, and the application of resources during
task execution?
- What authorities are denied to the performer during task execution?
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
How should the successful achievement of this
goal be judged?
|
|
|
- Adjust this language for machine performance. For example,
with regard to computers doing the performing, one might think about
accessible RAM, available storage, or the types of input or output devices
or for non-computing devices. If the performer is an non-computing machine,
one might consider operating temperature, speed, power consumption,
breakdown rate, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
7. Using the “Why” Information in Building the Components of Your Goal |
|
|
Information |
Potential
Use(s ) |
|
|
What is the problem this
goal is suppose to resolve or the opportunity it is to advance or realize? |
Helps define the structural
foundation of the goal. |
|
|
How, when, and where was
the problem or opportunity detected? |
Helps you uncover who
is affected. May also assist in focusing the location where the goal's
result must occur. |
|
|
Who does this problem
or opportunity involve or affect? |
Helps define the potential
beneficiaries from achieving the goal. |
|
|
How is the problem hurting
whomever it involves or affects or how can the opportunity enhance these
people or groups when it is realized? |
Helps identify possible
benefits the goal's realization should produce. |
|
|
Why does the problem exist?
In other words, what are its root causes? Which root cause is the goal
eliminating? What needed elements must be put in place to advance or
realize the opportunity the goal was established to advance? Which needed
element is the goal putting in place? |
Helps define the structural
foundation of the goal. Also, provides information important to defining
the action that will be implemented to achieve the goal. |
|
|
What previous efforts
have been tried to remove this root cause or to put in place the needed
element? |
Provides information important
to defining the action that will be successfully produce the result
the goal must generate. |
|
|
Why did these efforts
fail? |
Provides information that
relates to identifying conditions one should include in the goal statement.
Basically, avoid what failed or include some specific action to prevent
repetitions of prior failures. |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Define the Goal's Success Criteria
Success criteria tend to be the most difficult goal component to define. As
stated above, they are the benchmarks that task performance must meet for it
to be judged successful. You need a success criterion for judging whether you
have:
- produced each expected output,
- provided each benefit your task was to deliver, and
- satisfied every condition with which your performance was to comply.
Each success criterion is composed of three elementsan anchor, a measure,
and a target (Exhibit 8). Exhibit 9 provides one example of a success criterion.
The remainder of this guidance will describe each component of a success criterion
in greater detail and build the success criteria for the goal specified in Exhibit
5.
|
Exhibit
9. An Example of a Success Criterion |
|
|
Anchor |
Measure |
Target |
|
|
Tells what the evaluator
wants to know the status of |
Tells how the evaluator
gauges status |
Tells the value
on the measure that defines success |
|
|
Revenue growth |
Each month, subtract current
quarter revenues as reported in financial statements from revenues earned
in the same quarter last year. Divide by revenues earned in the same quarter
last year and multiple by 100%. |
=>12% |
|
|
Together,
the components provide an evaluator the information needed to judge whether
the element of a goal specified in the anchor has been successfully accomplished. |
|
|
|
|
Anchors
The anchor identifies a focus for evaluationthe who or what the evaluator
will measure the status of. It names a result, benefit, or condition specified
in the goal and the feature of it to be evaluated. For example, given the
goal specified in Exhibit 5, the possible anchors would be:
- Programming mistakes related to using the Netlink API,
- Programmers' time spent advancing the development of the application as
compared to time spent fixing Netlink API coding errors,
- Quality of code produced using Netlink API,
- Development time for code using Netlink API,
- Development costs for components using Netlink API,
- Programmers apply the guidance only their code uses the 2.6 series kernel,
- Registration of user processes that must be sent unrequested messages
or data with the kernel component, and
- Consistency of coding with the understanding that the API is socket based.
Typically, more anchors are specified in a goal than the goal's manager will
evaluate. How many anchors have success criterion written for them depends
on the importance placed on correct goal achievement and the cost associated
with completing the evaluation. An anchor's importance presumes that someone
will make meaningful decisions based on its evaluation. Clearly, if no one
will make meaningful decisions based on the evaluation of a particular anchor,
then its evaluation is waste. Naturally, if someone should be making
decisions based on the anchor's status, as judge by his or her fiduciary responsibilities,
then that person's behavior should be adjusted and the anchor included.
Measures
The measure tells how you will detect the status of the anchor. Each measure
specifies a method for calibration (metric) and the time period for making
the calibratione.g., count the number of work processes for which standards
are documented monthly, sum the dollar amount of cost savings produced annually,
compute the average level of satisfaction with training people report quarterly,
or determine the percentage of actions finished on or before their "complete
by" dates annually. It also explains how observed data is processed to produce
the value needed to compare against the anchor's target (see example in Exhibit
8).
A measure may calibrate status in terms of quantity, quality, timeliness,
or efficiency.
- Use quantity metrics to register whether some expected result exists,
how much or how many units are produced, or how completely some set of activities
are done or components of a product are implemented.
- Use quality metrics to register how correctly or how usefully some product
or service outcome is rendered; how consistent it is with policy, guidelines
or specifications; how satisfying it is to its recipients; or how improved
it is over time.
- Use timeliness metrics to register whether schedules are met or resources
are available when needed.
- Use efficiency metrics to register whether an expected rate or ratio is
realizede.g., the number produced per unit of time or the relationship
of monetary cost and benefits either to each other (e.g., cost benefit ratio)
or relative to some benchmark (cost effectiveness ratio).
Exhibit 10 suggests which metrics are useful to consider given the focus
of your anchor. Exhibit 11 lists the measures used to calibrate the status
of anchors specified for the goal depicted in Exhibit 5, above.
|
Exhibit
10. Examples of Metrics for Anchors Having Different Focuses |
|
|
If
the Anchor Focuses On ... |
Then
Consider These Metrics ... |
|
|
The presence or absence
of an object or feature |
- "Yes" or "Present" and "No" or "Absent"
|
|
|
The amount or size of something |
|
- Length, width, or height
- Volume
- Sum
|
|
|
The typical amount of something
produced multiple times |
|
|
|
|
The degree to which a quality
indicator is realized or improvement has occurred |
- Percent
- Difference from expected
|
- Difference from baseline
- Slope of the line of best fit for a time series
|
|
|
The timeliness of occurrence |
- Percentage of on-time deliveries
|
- Difference between expected and actual delivery dates
|
|
|
The efficiency of performance |
- Cost per unit produced
- Number produced per unit of time
- Ratio of cost to benefits (ROI)
|
- Ratio of old to new cost
- Ratio of unit cost to a benchmark (e.g., industry average)
|
|
|
|
|
Targets
The last element of a success criterion is the target. It states the value
on the measure that indicates whether the anchor's status meets expectation
as defined by the goale.g., 25 work process standards documented, $5,000,000
in cost savings realized, "expenditures do not exceed budget" or "report contains
all requested information." Exhibit 11 presents the complete statement of
each success criterion named in the success criteria section of the goal depicted
in Exhibit 5, above.
|
Exhibit
11. Success Criteria for the Standards Section of the Goal Depicted in
Exhibit 5 (continued) |
|
|
Anchor |
Measure |
Target |
|
|
Programming mistakes related
to using the Netlink API |
Ratio of the average number
of coding errors related to Netlink API use observed when coding does not
use the guidance as compared to when it is used |
Ratio is greater than 1 |
|
|
Programmers' time spent advancing
the product relative to time spent fixing Netlink API coding errors |
Ratio of average percentage
of development time for code using Netlink API spent fixing Netlink API
coding errors to baseline established prior to use of guidance |
Ratio is less than 1 |
|
|
Quality of code produced using
Netlink API |
Ratio of the average incidence
of coding errors for components using Netlink API before introduction of
this guidance to the average for components using Netlink API after the
introduction of this guidance1 |
Ratio is greater than 1 |
|
|
Development time for code
using Netlink API |
Ratio of the average development
time for components using Netlink API before introduction of this guidance
to the average for components using Netlink API after the introduction of
this guidance1 |
Ratio is greater than 1 |
|
|
Development costs for components
using Netlink API |
Ratio of the average development
cost for components using Netlink API before introduction of this guidance
to the average for components using Netlink API after the introduction of
this guidance1 |
Ratio is greater than 1 |
|
|
Programmers apply the guidance
with code using the 2.6 series kernel |
Count the incidences where
the guidance is applied with code not using the 2.6 series kernel |
0 |
|
|
Code registers with the kernel
component every user process that must be sent unrequested messages or data |
Count the incidences where
a user process that must be sent unrequested messages or data is not registered
with the kernel |
0 |
|
|
Coding is consistent with
the understanding that the API is socket based |
Count the incidences of coding
statements that are inconsistent with the understanding that the API is
socket based |
0 |
|
|
- Comparison adjusts for the average size and complexity
of the components being compared.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Test the Goal's Correctness
Use the guidance in Exhibit 12 to verify the correctness of your goal statement.
Correct any goal component that fails. Retest the corrected goal to ensure that
the proper changes were made. Once done, document the goal in its final form.
|
Exhibit
12. Verifying the Correctness of a Complete Goal Statement |
|
|
Component |
Contents |
Test |
|
|
To |
States the result the goal
must produce. Always begins, "To" and ends with naming whatever the
task must generate. |
If the "To" correctly represents the object to
be created or transformed and the final state to be produced,
Then the "To" is verified. |
|
|
For |
States for whom the result
is being producedthe beneficiaries of the goal. |
If the "For" identifies the primary beneficiary
and every other party who is to benefit from the goal's achievement,
|
|
|
By |
Names the task or process
to be implemented. |
If the "By" specifies an action that one might reasonably expect will
produce the result specified in the "To" given the "Conditions" stated
in the goal,
(Note: Correct any problem by either adjusting the constraints or seeking
an alternative method for producing the result the goal must generate.) |
|
|
So That |
States the benefits the result
should produce for each beneficiary. Identifies how the beneficiaries of
the goal will be better off once the "To" is achieved. |
If there is at least one benefit identified for every party specified
in the "For" statement
and each benefit is a likely immediate consequent of accomplishing
the result listed in the "To,"
and the benefits listed in the "So That" component satisfy the gains
desired as stated in the "'Why' behind the goal?"
(Note: If the first condition is passed and the second is failed, then
fix the "To." If both are failed, then fix the "So That" and retest.) |
|
|
Conditions |
States other requirements
the performance of the task or process must satisfy. These may:
- limit resources used (e.g., time, money, people),
- require a performer to do certain actionse.g., use a certain
tool or involve specified people, or
- set as "off-limits" certain decisions
or actions. |
If the "Conditions" list all the constraints expressed in the "Why" behind
the goal
and every constraint that owner of this goal expects its accomplishment
to satisfy,
(Note: If the Conditions fail, correct them and then retest the "By.")
|
|
|
Success Criteria |
The benchmarks that must be
met for the goal to be judged as achieved. Always includes criteria that
test whether the efforts expended:
- produced the result specified in the "To,"
- delivered the benefits specified in the "So That," and
- satisfied the constraints recorded in the "Conditions."
|
If each success criterion has an anchor, measure, and target stated,
and there is an anchor to judge whether the "To" was accomplished,
and there is an anchor to judge whether each benefit in the "So That"
component was delivered,
and there is an anchor to judge whether each constraint in the "Conditions"
component was satisfied,
and for all measures, it is true that each specifies a metric, method
of measurement, and a method for evaluating the information measurement
produces,
and for all measures, it is true that the measure, if implemented as
described, would produce information that one could reasonably use
as evidence that
the anchor was satisfied was also achieved,
and for all measures, it is true that each generates a result that can
be used to test whether the target has been realized,
and for all targets, it is true that each expresses a result that, if
realized, would reasonable justify concluding that the anchor was realized,
Then the success criteria component is verified. |
|
|
|
|
Following Up Tasks
1. Document the final, verified goal.
Record your tested goal. Use the format depicted in Exhibit 5, above. It permits
you to create a visual display that can be mounted and shared with others involved
in pursuing the goal. Be sure to add a table as depicted in Exhibit 11, above,
to document the complete success criteria that must be used to judge the success
of your efforts.
2. Use the goal statement to plan, execute, and achieve
the goal.
After aligning yourself and others to the goal that must be realized, use the
goal statement to prepare an action plan for accomplishing the goal. An example
of an action plan can be seen here - Action
Plan. Guidance for building an action plan is provided in the Kaizen
Desk Reference Standard (Vitalo, Butz, and Vitalo, pp. 345348).
Special CircumstanceAn
Assigned Task or Purpose
When a task or purpose is assigned to you by another, there is additional work
one must do in defining a proper goal. Since supervisors, managers, and executives
rarely provide the information needed to understand the work they assign, you
must ferret out what it is they want you to accomplish through dialog with them
and by comparison of the "Why" behind the assignment and the apparent content
of the request as made. Usually, there will not be a match between these elements
because the person assigning the goal is unlikely to be skilled in building
goals. As a result, the goal statement derived from a correct documentation
of the reason for pursuing the goal will not match the statement derived from
the verbal or written guidance provided by the person assigning you the goal.
For assistance in addressing this particular issue, see Leading
a Kaizen or Lean Initiative: First Task. While the article addresses
specifically the circumstance of being assigned a task associated with implementing
Kaizen or a Lean initiative, it is straightforwardly applicable to any task
or purpose assigned to a performer. It provides guidance for documenting the
goal of an assignment made to you by another from the perspective of the person
making the assignment. Use the guidance in this article to document the goal
as it should be defined based on the actual reason the goal is being pursued.
Work through any discrepancies between the two with the person assigning you
the work.
©1990-2020 Vital Enterprises - Hope, Maine 04847 - Published July 2008;
Revised October 2010, December 2010, October 2012, February 21, 2013, June
27, 2019, December 12, 2020
Help Us
Provide You Better Content. |
|
|
Tell us your thoughts about this
article. |
|
Be sure to name the article in
your feedback. |
|
|
|